Page 36, 1 December 2010 edition
You see the amount of vandalism on this piece of paper? Those aren’t just grammar mistakes. It’s fine, you know, at least it was communicated. But this one article really represents the problem that I see with the whole Borneo Bulletin.
A lot of the information are wrong. This is my particular beef with Borneo Bulletin. The journalism is slightly lackluster and I know that the journalists work hard, but why can’t you just cover relevant news as oppose to covering news about a new restaurant opening or a school visit to the prison? That way, you’d have more time to get your writing right. I know your money depend on the amount of article you write, but isn’t it also important to have facts that are correct to inform the public. Your job isn’t to mislead, your job is to enhance the credibility of news. Interviewing one person isn’t credible. If and when a majority of the public knows you’re wrong, then you’re not doing your job right.
What disturbs me the most about the article above is the fact that by the end of it, there was no point to it. It didn’t linked to the title at all. The only thing I gathered from it is coffee shop talk discussion about how the author was pro-opposition. There was little to no mention of the Barisan Nasional which just makes the whole article redundant. Why, Mister Editor, you’re doing a swell job!
Seriously, why waste a full page for something that is complete bull? You might as well add another page for comics.







